The mark pointed at by the arrow is a planchet mark, and, as @Razz says, common since nickel is hard and these don't always get hammered out...
[ATTACH]
Same experience. We just sold the entire house contents, including around 100 Precious Moments, with original boxes, for $800. Take the deal at...
Type 2 Proof, also PF 66. [ATTACH]
Here’s one I paid 84.75 for. It is almost certainly cleaned and retoned. But I liked the look and had planned it as a gift. So the purpose and...
I like the looks of the coin. Good, honest wear, so you can hold it and think of all the hands it went through around WWI and the roaring...
I did a quick iphone edit to see the obverse better. Full image is easier for the members to see than thumbnails. [ATTACH]
@C-B-D may have posted this before he sold it to me. In any case, now it's my new acquisition, with new photos. [ATTACH]
Just arrived. Very reflective! [ATTACH]
My replacement for the 1982-D small date zincoln is so reflective it seems close to proof-like. I tried two different techniques to show it....
@Clawcoins pointed out the redone dies, which I never realized. Yet, the evidence was right in front of me, as shown in these photos. Check out...
Darn, now I’m all confused. I actually have an 1896 with light rim toning, so I took another look at it. It’s not graded, so I’m not getting any...
This is the original 1982 Small Date Zinc shown back in post #4516. [ATTACH] And here is it's "Gem BU" replacement. There are lots of die...
After watching the video my enthusiasm for 65 PL has waned. Now I think it is both circulated and polished.
I was working my way through rephotographing the more recent Lincolns, when I saw that, not only did these 1982 cents need redone, but some should...
Had an extra moment so I rotated and cropped your image. It’s easier to see how nice it is. [ATTACH]
65PL
I have two I got from eBay. This one was for 170. [ATTACH] And this one was for 137.50. [ATTACH] I discussed this a little back in the post...
Separate names with a comma.
