Likewise, the coin shown above was replaced by this one. [ATTACH] Full resolution photos: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
A while back I upgraded from the coin above to this 1970-D, but have just now taken pictures of it. In hand it is pale and very reflective, so I'm...
Now that @Lehigh96 revealed the clue, I can also say that the photo looked like silver instead of nickel. A second clue might be a generally weak...
New photos of the 1946-D Lincoln from the original post. It has been removed from the holder. [ATTACH]
Sure, what the heck! 1944-P ??????
I sorta bought this by mistake, but it was inexpensive. I was looking for a better 1925-D than this one (see post #6242 for more photos)....
New photo, replacing the one from the original post. [ATTACH] Please expand for full resolution photos. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I upgraded my 1919 a couple of years ago, as I posted in #26638. These are new pictures. It's possible the coin has been toning more, or maybe my...
I replaced this 1918-D (ANACS MS61) [ATTACH] with this ungraded one. [ATTACH] Here are some detailed still images. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] ANACS...
Learning how to take a bad photo is also an art. Some dealers may do so to make sure they under-promise and over-deliver. The buyer has low...
I am going with yes. I think the marks across the top 4 steps don’t rise to the level of preventing full steps.
The first few years of Zincolns could be really bad with these plating bubbles. [ATTACH]
A proof is always a proof because that refers to the way it was struck. If it later gets mishandled, it’s still a proof, but no longer...
I know what you mean. There’s just something about the big round zero in 1910 that I really like. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
After watching deer out of our windows for years, I have to conclude that they are pretty smart, and without a doubt can just be playing because...
A fox is not big enough to take down a deer. A rabbit, OK, but not a deer. Even a turkey is too much for a fox. When they spread their wings and...
I should have mentioned that the 1916 obverse was re-engraved and is the best of the series. Here, for comparison, is a 1958 proof. All the fine...
It’s amazing how proof-like the 1916’s can look. I had to go look up the registry to look up @robec ’s cent, to see that it was not actually a...
[ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
