It may look like a damaged coin but it’s a lamination error and it’s a beauty.
At the moment I have to say no. Pictures may change my mind but I doubt it.
Very nice clash!
If you’re referring to that scratch age yet the O in the date, it’s damaged.
Both damaged as stated.
Nice and a different Die crack from the normal.
I was looking at the first photo and asking myself, what’s so special about this bill? Finally I scrolled down farther and said the back. Lol
Boy that would’ve fun to go through. One look and I can see why you almost had a heart attack.
To me it looks normal for a large cent that has been cleaned.
Thanks Inspector
I want a much better one for my Dansco but I can’t find the right one.
I really like the look of those dimes but you may want to call a TPG to discuss conservation of them.
Poor Abe took a chip on his chin.
Sometime yesterday I hit that figure. It was a bad day for me. Better now but that life. Here is a decent Two Cent Piece dated 1867. There were...
The seller is probably not the one person that damaged the coin. They may have thought it was an error when they bought it and never found out or...
It’s nice looking but unfortunately it’s been cleaned so no real value there.
If you have a backwards LiB on you coin it was probably pit with another coin and squeezed in a vise after it left the mint. This is done by many...
Congratulations are in order! I enlarged and could see the top of the D without a loupe.
They can’t inspect them all.
A quarter that was probably damaged by heat.
Separate names with a comma.
