[ATTACH]
Quite true. And the second is a much better strike overall, while being worse in the steps. It shows the variation that business strikes can have....
Another set for comparison. Two Business, then proof. The first business strike has a remarkable resemblance to the OP’s coin. Notice the weakness...
Another example, ungraded. [ATTACH]
Wow! Did you send that in yourself or buy it graded? The holder looks as pristine as the coin. Also, that’s a great photo. That nickel jumps off...
Thanks, @BadThad. I also picked up another 1953, so I am getting pretty solid on the 50-55 P's now. Both my recent 1953's show a little doubling...
OK, I think I've found my 1954. There are very few graded above MS66, which makes me very happy with this raw coin from eBay. [ATTACH] Full...
Since I have filed the first tax statement since retirement, I discovered how much of my taxes came from my (now missing) paycheck. I’m sorry to...
I meant to post this yesterday, but never hit “Post Reply”.[ATTACH] So, let’s try this one instead. [ATTACH]
1917 Type 1 reverse vs. a Type 2 reverse, in this case a 1929. [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] Also, a nice overstrike from Daniel Carr, which allows me to enjoy the design even though I could not afford an original in this...
Wow, maybe we can help with that. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Thanks. Here’s my other 1969-S Proof. The steps really stand out due to the toning deep in the lines. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
First we have a business strike 69-S, then a proof. At best, two steps vs. 6 steps. I have two proofs and the steps are perfect on both. [ATTACH]...
Lookin’ real good there.
You could always use the extra hole to show the shield reverse! When I started collecting there were only two books! Now you need book four as well.
I saw a better 1924-D on my visit to the LCS. This is the previous one, [ATTACH] and this is the replacement that is going into the set....
That is an incredible improvement. I hope you don’t have to go back and redo all your other photographs, too.
Separate names with a comma.
