It's polished, but I think genuine.
Let me guess what they said. "PLEASE take down the YouTube video!"
Xf40 details, artificially toned.
This set may be collectible, but these coins are UUUUUGLY! (IMO).
Metal detector
Not my coins. Heritage.
Here's a PCGS AU50 with less detail but way more luster. I still prefer the CAC XF45. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I prefer the higher grade due to desirability of having an ALMOST uncirculated coin, (when you take attractive toning out of the equation). But...
And as my roofer once told me, "water will find its way through anything, given enough time."
I think in the case of these Morgans, there is a clear difference between the XF45 and both AU50's. In other series, the difference between AU50...
Here's an NGC AU50 with no CAC that sold for about $1000 more than the CAC'd XF45, but $800 less than the PCGS non-CAC'd AU50. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Here's an example. The first is an 1889 CC Morgan Dollar in PCGS XF45 CAC. The second is a PCGS AU50, not CAC'd. The sale price difference was...
Yes. Very common for busties. I agree it looks MS to me. Nicer fields than usual.
You know what they say... "What's the difference between an AU58 and an MS62? The amount of wear."
But but but.... DON Willis told me it was THE PERFECT, MOST SECURE HOLDER!!
That's mean.
Right? But I'd say he's just as upset, (if not more upset), about the intimidation and embarrassment part.
Thinking on your feet and not being intimidated can be a tough thing. I'm not a confrontational person either 95% of the time. But, hey, you...
Well, I just got word. I was right. MS64 RD.
Should know in a day or two. It's in grading/quality control.
Separate names with a comma.
