Which is what being a numismatist is all about.
No. Well, at least, I've never seen a coin labeled as such before. ANACS is the only TPG that may do that.
Ants-ies in your pants-ies?
I think it is an amazing bit of research by @Paddy54. Very impressive and super interesting. Hats off to you, for seeing it and pursuing it.
I like U.S. type coins!
64 BN
I doubt they'll catch it, but they may. It wasn't on the form. I can send them an email or call them, but customer service is not worth a darn...
I found this proof with what I think is the RPD. Has the same reverse die as well, I believe. But this one does not have the clashing? [ATTACH]...
That is an exact match of the die pairs. But is the lower one a business strike?
Strange that a VF retained that much character. Would loved to have seen this when it was fresh BU.
What a fantastic find and link. This is why I love CT. Never knew this. And it's a legit error! Super heavy "progressive indirect design transfer"...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I did not. Had no clue till Paddy messaged me. It was sent to PCGS this morning.
I looked at a dozen proofs on Heritage, but none of them had a RPD. Many did have poorly struck reverse stars, however, primarily on the left side...
Well the 23-S is the better one of the three in UNC, so that's good. I have very little experience grading Lincoln's, but I know that with some of...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
$46 [ATTACH]
$9. [ATTACH]
$15 [ATTACH]
$1 [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.