No thank you! However, if you watch out for these details pieces, winning one in the $10-$20 range is fully doable.
$2,500 on the 3c ...just a guess...looks nice though!
Points Table ddddd - 17.01 Points baseball21 - 14.61 Points Beefer518 - 11.51 Points jwitten - 11.01 Points ron_c - 10.01 Points Lehigh96 - 9.51...
Points Table Beefer518 - 10 Points Johndoe2000$ - 10 Points ron_c - 6 Points KSorbo - 6 Points ddddd - 6 Points baseball21 - 3 Points Pickin and...
Winner! It's Unc Details - Cleaned and I won it for $10 (so you're closest on price and got the details/cleaned part) [ATTACH]
I’ll call it this evening. Get your guesses in!
Depends how much I bid:D I’ll guess 196 (with the buyer premium)
$825 on the 81-S ...normal examples have been down lately (around $600)... the CAC likely helps bump up the premium.
And I agree it's a beautiful coin. Besides the marks on the cheek and the hit in the field (above the nose/eye area), the coin looks pristine for...
@TypeCoin971793 is right; this is the newest NGC holder (with the text on the left side).
I think that might change things. As we saw with the infamous "matte proof" Lincoln episode, what one writes on the form can heavily influence the...
I don't know, but will be interested to see what happens. My guess is it will be placed in an "XF" circulation strike (non-proof) holder, but...
While we wait for @V. Kurt Bellman here is a temporary item that I referenced earlier (the one that @Beefer518 's coin reminded me of). As usual:...
Points Table Beefer518 - 10 Points Johndoe2000$ - 9 Points ron_c - 6 Points KSorbo - 6 Points ddddd - 6 Points baseball21 - 3 Points Pickin and...
As long as they don’t fall into the “weird stuff” part, that should be fine. :p
Here is one I saw on another forum....
$93 ...I like it, but 1958 is known for some extremely nice mint set toners and this one isn’t quite a monster for the year.
When silver was in the $5 range in the early 2000s, my local coin store was selling all Eagles for $7-$8 (only the 1986 and 1996 were more expensive).
Most likely a mechanical error at NGC. This is a case where one is better off contacting NGC to change it due to the difference in value. They...
This was my first thought as well. The 23-S looks a bit odd to me (potentially altered surfaces), but I do think it's the nicest of the three.
Separate names with a comma.
