G or VG. Maybe details.
First one is really nice good value. 2nd one is $2 or $3 depending if it is zinc or copper.
I've done this twice, once each the last 2 years mostly MD finds but other bent, broken coins that machines won't accept. It's called :Mutilated...
Maybe take it out and photo it without the flash. It's hard to tell in this pic.
Should be an AU 58. 53 is a scooch low. It has been mentioned they have been strict on these halfies recently. They wear easily and this is a nice...
Sept 2017
Mr. Clean. It just has that sterile look.
Looks like a big lamination. Wait for an expert.
If that photo is accurate I think QC. (Questionable color.) There are 2 1864's. One is copper/nickel which can have a slight silvery appearance....
Was unaware of these varieties, they are interesting to say the least. Maybe I can get lucky in a junk box. LOL
The recent posts are concerning a post in the middle of the thread from late 2017 and not the original post.
Doesn't appear cleaned to me. Looks like circulation scratches. VF or VF Details. Nice find.
I understood your post. Just giving him the information if he was not aware of it.
IDK what you are asking. It looks like a regular 1959. They are very common, there's no reason to fake anything. Unless I am missing something.
I think stamp collectors prefer their stuff not to be canceled or glued.
On the 1827 there is a rare flat top 1, yours is pointed. And on the 1829 there is a super valuable curl base 2. Yours seems square. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
No S cents from 1956-1967, 1968-1974 resumed and then 1975-present proof only.
When they make them out of good metal these coins last thousands of years.
Agree with Paddy. But, would need photos, if they were replated then yes. If they are AU and uncleaned then no.
The ones that are in good shape are around a dime or 15 cents. The S mints in good shape bring a little more. Yours are beat up. 3-5 cents.
Separate names with a comma.
