$20[ATTACH]
$10 [ATTACH]
$36[ATTACH]
I mean, how are we supposed to grade this??? :oops::D:facepalm: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
From ngc website. And no. I wouldn't have graded it AU if I had seen these. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I guess it must sing in-hand. But it sure doesn't in the pics. No offense.
Wow. Why a star? Why that grade? I just don't see it. But congrats!
That must be a hint that yours slabbed 62... If so, send it back. Must be a mechanical error. LOL
Y'all.... look at the luster on typecoin's MS62 compared to the OP coin.
I see wear, lack of luster, and marks. AU55.
OMG I bet it CACS
The reverse is gemmy...
We defend our coins like our children, @1916D10C. Don't get too bothered by it. It's just the yankee in him! :p
He didn't mention it in his comments. I suspect it's just crud. Dunno.
@Conder101 , @Marshall , @Jack D. Young
Mr. Poliquin said that this one should not be confused with cuds, since they are just heavy die breaks.
Not a bad El Cheapo buy at $17.50, huh? And he took the pics this time.
Sent this to David Poliquin hoping I had the most amazing looking Misplaced Date ever, (or dropped letter) but he determined it to be a small die...
Great deal! I just snagged one of these for $29 and considered it a nice win. Yours looks a point or two better than mine.
On coins this old, I don't require much luster at all, if any, to make AU50. But I grade like PCGS, and many people don't agree with the way they...
Separate names with a comma.