I see that rim damage. But I see 3 clips?
Thanks! [ATTACH]
:facepalm: Who wants to bet these awful pics of the computer screen are the seller's pics, and he sent this guy a different coin and the guy never...
If you read the other linked thread, he shows pics of a $3 gold that he says is a different coin as well. Here are his pics. Not sure which bi is...
Hard to decipher, as English doesn't appear to be his 1st language, but I think he's trying to type that the "black mark is attached," as in, not...
Who doesn't make sense? This really isn't worth my time but here: if someone sold you this coin as an 1882 O/S, then they lied to you. This is...
Additionally, I doubt legal action is necessary unless this is an 1893-S or something.
Your post doesn't make sense. Please label which are the BEFORE pics and which are the AFTER. Also provide an explanation of your accusation, and...
Never to me, that I know of. I've had sellers cancel and relist sometimes, but usually because they realize they missed a cherrypick.
[ATTACH]
I got a VF35 on this one. Kinda baffled! [ATTACH]
Gracious... not a stain, folks. That's an improper alloy mix. Happened frequently with this series as well as Indians and early Lincolns.
@Dougmeister
Thanks. I knew that date and mintmark position... but the 4 digit looks weird. Funnily enough, this came from a guy whose father in law passed...
The mintmark placement and it's shape looks correct for a 14 D. But something is wrong. I don't think it was a 44-D, based on the size and other...
More pics. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
This is all I've got to go on at the moment. Guy didn't send me a reverse pic yet. Looks UNC to me. Look authentic to you guys and gals? [ATTACH]
1888-O PCGS MS62 DMPL. [ATTACH]
1895-S PCGS XF45. [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.