I agree, I discount US mint items when buying them if they do not have COA's or boxes because the people who buy them from me then discount them...
This walked into the shop this morning, I thought I'd share. [IMG]
Yeah the ones I have sold brought about another half again as much as their normal value
Packaging errors happen pretty often... I have had several state quarter mint sets with that same kind of packing error. They are neat... and...
Nice find in a roll!!! Nothing like free coins...
I have been to a few of these auctions... and have sat and watched people pay stupid money for junk coins... save your gas
im gonna say that that lighting is hiding a lot of light abrasions... look in the hair for example... looks like lots of little contacts... ill...
[IMG]
and from the pics the way they are... there is really no way to tell if there is any luster at all... just details alone...
:whistle:
I can confirm it... I have seen some as well... don't quite know what causes it.
I have also seen an earlier state example of this piece.... Just from the coins posted and the one that I have seen it would make me suspect that...
huh?? I cant even understand what point your trying to convey... what exactly is the big picture???
Then make sure that the information your giving people is correct... and not completely wrong...
I cant even understand your useless drivel.
That would make sense... I wonder why they changed them later? People prob. had the same reaction that jello had.... that's weird.
Here is another 1894 S with the same placement [IMG]
its a shattered obverse die
Funny, That picture you posted was originally printed in the Indianapolis Business Journal in 2007, I was even younger then. And i'll tell you...
Mint marks on barber quarters are all over the place... on the earlier pieces it was not unusual to see a mint mark in this position. Believe it...
Separate names with a comma.
