Summary Rd. 1: 1921 MS 65 Green CAC Morgan--> Yes: 4 vs No: 3 Rd. 2: 1835 AU 50 Green CAC 50c--> Yes: 2 vs No: 8 Rd. 3: 1939-S Oregon MS 65...
I saw that one, so I won't guess this round.
I see it as maxing out at 65 FBL (FBL due to PCGS being more lenient on the designation) and 65 since it is fairly clean but there are dings and...
Anyone have something?
It looks like you are up next after this quarter is revealed. (I went back and looked but anyone feel free to correct me if I missed your turn)
It's the newest generation of holder. Although this generation has been around for a while now (2015 to present). My best guess would be that it...
Definitely one that should bring plenty of discussion. :D I agree with the sentiments expressed so far. A good point was brought up that the...
I gave this one a quick glance (as quick as the TPGs/CAC people :p) and my first impression was it looks solid. I still find it attractive, but I...
And back to the Quarter... I'll say Green ...and I like the look of this one regardless of sticker
This makes me think I'm multiple points off. :eek::p
Floor is open...
Summary: Rd. 1: 1955-S MS 64 1c (NO Star) --> Should it star? -->Yes: 2 vs No: 11 Rd. 2: 1885-O MS 65 $1 (NO Star) —>Should it star? —> Yes: 4 vs...
MS 64 ...nice look overall; some hits in focal areas (but these seem to be more acceptable on gold coins from what I have seen)
I like it and think it is a nice coin but again will say no star as several spots stick out to me
Technically it should be the same at any grade level as for MS (a green sticker in the next grade as mentioned by @kSigSteve above). However, I've...
Now onto the 1839-O 50c... I'll say Green CAC (looks appropriate as a 53 to me)
It happens to all of us. I have mentioned before that I also bought a half cent that had a CAC sticker (MS 64 CAC) and was unimpressed by it (lack...
Separate names with a comma.
