@gronnh20 we want to know who gets the points :D
Does this mean I can keep complaining since I guessed the same both times. :D In all seriousness, it is a good point. We should note that all 7...
This one is even more extreme and it's a details coin. :eek: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
That one looks less severe, but with no color it probably stuck out more to the graders.
PF 69 UCAM ....or is it 70 and I lost my chance at all the bonus points :eek::p
It's hard to say. The one time JA (founder of CAC) talked about it, he said a gold is a coin that would get a green at the next grade (so in...
MS 66 and I could see it getting the NGC star for toning
I wouldn't either as I think it's beyond maxed (although you never know).
You were in time where I was still able to edit my post. :D
It sold for $930 at auction (not to me).
I thought you might take the position that the scratch wasn't enough to detail it given the color. So I was a bit surprised when you voted...
That was my thinking (at least a scratch and maybe even graffiti). The "X" carved into the left obverse field looks significant to me and really...
And the 63 crowd edged out the details crowd by a single vote (9 vs 8). The next closest was 64 with 6 votes. [ATTACH]
MS 64 FB
Total time spent: May 2017 - June 2020 Summary of where the coins came from: Raw 43 PCGS 11 NGC 9...
Last spot filled with this 1917 type 1 SLQ. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I agree! :)
MS 65
Not CAC
65 fs (5fs) ....this one looks to be the weakest of all three (worst strike)...I still went 65 as it's clean but it might not even make the gem...
Separate names with a comma.
