Yup and look at what I’ve found! :smuggrin:
The books are written for the entire country but the prices in one area are completely different in another part.
It’s either a MS-63 or 64. I’m going with a 63 due to bag marks.
Definitely stained as stated.
I can’t see through it at all. I really tried but I just can’t. I do see a coin that’s toned in a 2 x 2 and it’s 86 years old.
For now I’d let the roll stay as is. Think about it. There’s no reason to rush opening it. You can do that anytime. How long have you had the...
Also, remember that the Red Book is a guide book, not a price guide.
Because the lowest grade is MS-63, otherwise this is a common date with a high mintage.
The headdress and feathers look normal to me. It was common for them to have a worn look, however I think this coin is in the AU range.
Welcome to CT.
It’s a spender:
Just toning but I do like what appears to be a thin lamination going from the R in LIBERTY to the top of his nose.
If it was gold yes but there are a lot of coins in different denominations that have the date 1915. :)
If you’re convinced it is then it needs to be professionally graded.
XF-40 at best but I think it’s a details coin.
I thought you bought a coin for $2.50?with that title. Nice looking.
Nice well worn Wheat Cents. No errors and nothing special.
Not an error of any type. It’s a rubber like glue used to hold coins to paper. This coin was probably attached to an offer by The March of Dimes...
@TheNickelGuy and @Randy Abercrombie I have been collecting for over 60 years, ever since I knew what coins were. My first folder was a Whitman’s...
Hope this helps you understand it clearer. Retained lamination: [ATTACH] Partial retained as about half is missing: [ATTACH] Delaminating as...
Separate names with a comma.
