Back to the 'kool' look Jim? :)
It is what it is people.........:)
Nope. Just an effect due to environmental issues.
You remember that indignity........:)
You got the magic glasses? I don't see a blasted thing......[ATTACH] Welcome to the forum and upload a shot at your earliest convenience.........:)
Spooning possibly?
Sure..........but I wouldn't soak it for a week. And I'd change the baths quite often........
Looks more like scratching then moving metal......I'd have passed on that one too.
Shades of grade school physicals past........
On that coin, it don't matter much, but when dealing with collectible specimens, you always grasp the edges........
Shoot, gettin' itchy......what's the grade? :)
I lusted after commems as a youth, bought the moderns when I was mature, and started collecting the classics (1893-1954) when I got...
Looks (maybe) like something corrosive came into contact with the coin, and peeled back a layer of metal.
Lost cause, and a waste of money.......that coin is so bloody ugly. I can't believe that a 'scan' would be so miserably off base.
The reverse looks '65 to me.......the obverse, '63.......net at '64.
Doubtful......
Lovely to see you Phil.......:)
I vote for a Chinese 'scoop'...........A blind man could have graded that coin better.......
Old guy is 'fuzzy' tonite,,,,,,,
'78? Chet Lemon?
Separate names with a comma.
