@physics-fan3.14 you're up followed by @Morgandude11 and then @brg5658 for a trifecta of non-Morgans :p
Summary Rd. 1: 1883-O Morgan NGC MS63* [Obv]...CT -> 3.6 (Mid) vs You -> 4 (Mid-High) Rd. 2: 1880 Morgan PCGS MS62 [Obv]...CT -> 2.7 (Low-Mid) vs...
He probably meant common dates. And unfortunately I don't have an answer. My guess is that they are at best tracking the spot price increases and...
AU 55 (I ruled out 58 and high unc but otherwise am struggling with this one...could be low unc)
There is a fun story related to that. The first picture is GC. I've owned the coin twice now. The first time I sold it to one of those guys that...
Yes we can do non-Morgans. @physics-fan3.14 can post next and then you can post @Morgandude11 @brg5658 can join in too. :)
I'll say YES to a Green ...very attractive circulated coin
I'll guess MS 63
And please let me know if anyone has something to post next.
Next up: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
3 ..interesting pattern but not vivid enough to get to a 4
It looks acceptable for a 64. I'd be ok with that as a CAC (64 A or B coin). It's a coin where I don't think CAC will make a big difference but...
MS 66 RD
Yep; the idea is to have a CT vs whoever posted it comparison (just for fun). And the poster of the coin portion is revealed at the end to prevent...
@Lehigh96 let us know what your score was. Until that point, please continue with Lehigh's Morgan. @physics-fan3.14 you can post after Lehigh's...
I believe Morgans are called monsters since they are the most frequently encountered with a variety of nice colors. Plus they are one of the few...
This link shows the common PCGS rattler holder: https://www.pcgs.com/holders/Gen1.2 And that name is used because the coins can rattle inside...
AU 50
Separate names with a comma.
