I'm also in the 63-64 camp on these. Maybe the best can squeeze out a 64+/65 (if given the "CC bump"). If grading, I'd only pick the ones from...
Condolences on your loss.
MS 64
It's a legitimate ICG slab. The photo isn't great and makes the toning look unattractive (it might be but we can't tell for certain). From what I...
While the official definition of these GEM Proofs is 65 or higher, my guess is that most are 68s (or even 69s). The dealers are mainly looking for...
Here is the answer from an NGC employee on their forum: "Gem Proof is a term that is only used for certain bulk submissions if the submitter...
@NPCoin that was much better said. I was referencing what you said but my initial comment was a poor way of phrasing it.
I'd say for most the answer is no. No matter how expensive your collection, you can't use inflation to your benefit on taxes. One instance where...
It goes back to the two main points already made in this thread: 1. You can't use it for your taxes 2. Many view it as a hobby and some don't...
I'll go with a 3 ..it's nice but at least one step below the previous world coin we had.
It has the look that I associate with whizzed coins (hard to explain exactly in this case). It could just be the poor photo and it's a...
It's possible. Either way (like others have mentioned), it's something that is better to pass on than gamble on (and then have to deal with...
Or possibly Whizzed ...has the look of being "worked" on
Summary Rd. 1: 1883-O Morgan NGC MS63* [Obv]...CT -> 3.6 (Mid) vs You -> 4 (Mid-High) Rd. 2: 1880 Morgan PCGS MS62 [Obv]...CT -> 2.7 (Low-Mid) vs...
I like seeing full slab photos because it can give a better idea of what the coin looks like. When people juice photos, the label and holder can...
It looked like @Morgandude11 wanted to post some foreign toners. Then you can post next.
Also, I'm thinking we should include slab photos or at least mention the grade as that does play a role. Do others agree or is it better to hide...
@brg5658 what were the specs on the coin so I can add it to the summary properly?
Sounds like you're thinking of Back to the Future Part II :D
Separate names with a comma.
