81-S is the poster/upper end for a 6 87 isn't as nice as the 81-S but still squeezes into a 6
@CircCam where were you on the nickel (I left it TBD for now) @Morgandude11 you can post your next examples
Summary Rd. 1: 1883-O Morgan NGC MS63* [Obv]...CT -> 3.6 (Mid) vs You -> 4 (Mid-High) Rd. 2: 1880 Morgan PCGS MS62 [Obv]...CT -> 2.7 (Low-Mid) vs...
Floor is open...
MS 67 5FS
MS 64
Nice progress and you're over half way there (at least mathematically). :D
That's a lovely set and a true testament to taking your time to find the special examples.
MS 64 PL ...nice overall with the reed marks on the cheek plus some field hits being the grade limiters
Reminder for those just tuning in, we are commenting on both of these: [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
Rd. 1: 1921 MS 65 Green CAC Morgan--> Yes: 4 vs No: 3 Rd. 2: 1835 AU 50 Green CAC 50c--> Yes: 2 vs No: 8 Rd. 3: 1939-S Oregon MS 65 Gold CAC...
@wxcoin your track record is perfectly respectable and don't let anyone tell you otherwise. :D Proof coins are harder to judge from photos and...
You are correct. Coins are subjective and toning is even more so. The true monsters (level 6) are fairly rare and I would think there would be...
@CircCam ’s Jefferson from the prior page is still in play and let’s do the Morgan that @Morgandude11 posted too. The Morgan looks like a 3
It’s a proof coin so a lot more is possible based on storage methods. There’s plenty of AT in straight graded holders from modern era proofs and...
I bought it using those photos and they seem good to me. I’m not seeing what you all are seeing to say that it’s unattractive. It’s variegated...
I’d call the nickel a 5
We are just seeing it differently. I’ve looked at a fair share of toners and I stick with my assessment. This thread is useful as toners don’t...
@CircCam you are up
The Peso is another one I'll have to disagree on. It's a nice variegated toner. And as a proof, it is different compared to business strike...
Separate names with a comma.
