Anyone else?
MS 64
[ATTACH]
PF 66 (maybe cameo but the obverse doesn't look the part based on this photo)
I like it but would go with high 4.
Also I noticed a US Philippines 50 Centavos. Is that new? I recall discussing Proof versions in one of my threads. I like the business strikes...
I always enjoy the updates! The box has grown and the quality is as superb as ever. I'm a fan of many (including the Peacock-we are two of the...
Here are my two Ukraine coins: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I remember that one. :D
I don't see anything particularly wrong with it. Anacs should have caught verdigris or PVC. I'd lean towards toning as well, but if it bothers...
Non-circulating legal tender https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-circulating_legal_tender
It doesn't look questionable to me. If any details grade was picked, environmental damage would make more sense (although I don't see that...
@Mainebill you are up
Summary Rd. 1: 1883-O Morgan NGC MS63* [Obv]...CT -> 3.6 (Mid) vs You -> 4 (Mid-High) Rd. 2: 1880 Morgan PCGS MS62 [Obv]...CT -> 2.7 (Low-Mid) vs...
MS 65 and not FBL (I believe I see a break) ....outside possibility of UNC Details Environmental Damage
For this date that grade isn't common. Plus, there are very few known toners graded PR 70 (I saw only one within the last year).
Hi all, A few items are posted below. Shipping is free unless otherwise stated). Payment via paypal (usually G&S, unless otherwise stated....for...
An attractive PR 68
The reverses of each can be seen in the links below: https://collectivecoin.com/AuroraBorealis/0u0KHeuautBMTpYKnYJm/oc1hRVEy73Ae8jnbJosT...
Separate names with a comma.