5.1 ....I like it ....the hits are there but it looks perfectly acceptable as a 63. Unfortunately NGC does not allow cross overs for anything...
Any more guesses before @Juno reveals it?
@Morgandude11 you are up...
Summary Chapter 1 Rd. 1: 1883-O Morgan NGC MS63* [Obv]...CT -> 3.6 (Mid) vs You -> 4 (Mid-High) Rd. 2: 1880 Morgan PCGS MS62 [Obv]...CT -> 2.7...
Was yours not toned? I'd be interested in seeing it as I have only seen them with stars or no grade (Uncirculated label).
The contract for the Battle Creek hoard had an agreement that every straight graded coin received a star. The other coins are just marked as...
I'll just have to disagree here. To me they are neutral. I can see someone paying a premium for them but the majority of people would not.
They are all ok, but they just don't have the colors (or coverage) to be much more than high 2s. These are the coins that end up making the star...
I think yours is a fair 3 since it has a nice spectrum of color even for a crescent. The examples I linked are fairly plain and in my view aren't...
And some more while I was looking (including non-Morgans)...
One more that might barely be a 2 https://www.greatcollections.com/Coin/859656/1896-Morgan-Silver-Dollar-NGC-MS-63-226-152-133-Toned (and this...
I’d call all of these 2s (maybe some can be bumped into low 3s, but not in my view)...
It’s a beautiful coin and you made the right call in hanging onto it!
I agree in theory that nothing with a star should rank in the theees but in practice NGC has even given two level toners stars.
Anyone else want to rate the Franklin posted by @Lehigh96 before he gives his score?
Any particular reason for it? Good for quizzes? :p
Separate names with a comma.
