MS 67 (not FS; no star) ....this one is very attractive and clean ....steps not there...and no star since NGC doesn't tend to give many for nickels
66....clean overall (might even have a case for 67)....I did vote 5FS because I thought they might give it even with the nick through the steps...
I was torn between 64 and 65 but bumped to a 65 based on luster/clean fields....that hit in the middle of the cheek could prevent the 65 and keep...
PF 66 Star (one-sided cameo)
One of my nicer looking 63s is the following: [IMG] [IMG]
MS 63 tends to be a grade where Morgans can be baggy and covered with marks. You can definitely find nicer than average examples with a little...
MS 63 ....marks in the fields look to be consistent with 63s
MS 64 ....this one looks to be a point weaker than the other two
MS 65 ...looks to have solid luster (like the other that I called a 65 too)
MS 64
MS 65
Great analysis @Publius2 ....you covered a lot of my concerns and even more beyond ....now to see if we are right or way off. :p
I'll update summary info after this round. I see what look to be adjustment marks and a spot in the hair. I'm not sure how CAC views this. I...
I'll guess MS 66. I've seen a few like this where the image (and probably the in-hand look) isn't super appealing but the coin gets a high grade....
It looks to already be PCGS graded. You are correct that these aren't worth grading if the coin is below a 65 FBL since 64 FBL examples can be...
MS 64 FBL ....too many hits to go 65 in my opinion
There isn't a way to get an exact date, just a range based on the holder generation. See here: https://www.pcgs.com/holders
NGC changed it some years back. https://www.ngccoin.com/news/article/2818/NGC-CrossOver-Special/ "NGC modified its CrossOver policy in January...
Separate names with a comma.
