:goofer: Duh. You're right, I did misunderstand you. :rolling: I am easily confused.... :goofer: I concur with your assessment. Although...
Congrats! :bow:
GDJMSP, I had not noticed that longacre doubling occurs mostly on both sides. Although I remain open to the possibility, a quick parusal of my...
Do you really think he would get that much from a dealer?
Neither, that's longacre doubling, common on IHCs...Mike [edited to add: I see someone beat me to the punch]
That's a tough one. Looks to me an MS coin, but what MS grade was assigned... Although surfaces seem to be a much higher grade, due to the...
The coin looks real and seems to have XF/AU details to me. The color looks a bit too even to be natural, and I suspect it may have been cleaned...
And with an attitude like that, you are assured many years of enjoyment. :thumb:
With a mintage of 30k with virtually all of them still extant, the 1995w proof is hardly considered numismatically rare. Popular, yes....
MS 63 obv, MS 64 rev MS 63 is my grade. I must say, all these GSA CC morgans are beginning to look the same to me :goofer:
I would still say that they are a poor investment and you shouldn't consider them as such. To wit, ask Elaine how the 1987 or 2002 SAEs fared....
There are much better ways to invest in silver than SAEs -- old silver coins are available at a much lower premium, as are silver ETFs. That...
I'd guess the average was based upon a very high grade coin... Click on the price and you'll see the specific auctions and grade. [edited to...
Check it out: http://www.pcgs.com/auctionprices/
I believe it is a fake, and not a particularly good one, either -- not coming close to the quality of the Scott restrikes...MIke
For future reference, you can embed the URL in IMG tags. Like this: {img}http://mywebpages.comcast.net/dcderoo/1-1838-AU58.jpg{/img} and...
Kanga, That's a very attractive 1838 and one I would be proud to own...Mike p.s. thanks for the kind words.
I don't consider myself an expert by any means, but as both a type and large cent collector, I think you have hit on a very interesting point......
I'm going to go 63.5 on this one. Could go either a 63 or a 64 -- depending on the cheek and fields...Mike
MS 63. Too many hits on the face for a 64, IMHO...Mike
Separate names with a comma.
