Summary Chapter 1 Rd. 1: 1883-O Morgan NGC MS63* [Obv]...CT -> 3.6 (Mid) vs You -> 4 (Mid-High) Rd. 2: 1880 Morgan PCGS MS62 [Obv]...CT -> 2.7...
Sort of. :p I have a box of 20 as my main set; then I have 10-20 more coins that could move into the box of 20 (box of 21-40). And I also have...
Thanks all! The Pan Pac was the nicest AU I've seen. While pricey, it did find a happy buyer during one of the times when I opened my box of 20...
I was confused at first how all these coins were stolen but then I connected the dots with the white elephant gift exchange. :p Congrats on some...
A few of mine that found new homes are pictured below. :) [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
With another year about to draw to an end, I though we could remember some of our coins that moved on to new homes in 2020. This is the third...
MS 66 not FS...this one is slightly better than #4
I was between 65 and 66 but went 65 (continuing with my theme of decreasing grades :p) ....it definitely looks like the weakest reverse among the...
Also in the pretty but not quite there camp...a solid 3.7
@kSigSteve you are up
I'm progressively decreasing my grades as these threads continue... MS 66 here ...there are some hits/marks scattered throughout and the cheek has...
First impression made me think this was on par with the prior coin; however, I bumped it down 0.5 points based on the hit to the left of the dome...
#1 ...2.0 ...same reasoning as Lehigh #2 ...1.9....minimal toning
MS 67 not fs ...very clean and lustrous...steps have breaks which prevent the designation
I agree that some labels are silly and personally don't feel the need to pay extra. I also understand that quite a few collectors stick to the...
@SSG_Gonzo you are up @kSigSteve you are on deck
Someone has to be first. :p I'll go second and guess MS 63 RB ....it looks fairly clean but being a semi-key date, I doubt it is graded that high...
Top MS 65; bottom QC? (I like the top better, regardless of PCGS grade)
Separate names with a comma.
