The order is certainly subjective, but I didn't disagree much with the overall inclusions.
Number 2 in [img]
Number 7 in [img]
I think you guys are being too harsh on that coin. While I don't think it will slab, I bet it is attractive in hand, AT or not. Zach, I would...
#4 in the book!
According to [img] the 1913 Liberty Nickel is number one. Personally, I like numbers 17 & 18, the 1915-S Panama-Pacific Exposition $50 Octogonal...
It looks so much like my registry coin, it is scary. [IMG]
[IMG] Now we need a Washington or something dated 1945, hint hint
I agree, I think it looks clean enough for a higher grade but it would depend on the luster. The payoff for an upgrade is certainly high enough...
That is correct. [IMG]
Are you aware that coin collecting was once known as "the hobby of kings?"
They go in my Intercept Shield album. It is a pretty nice collection actually.
I keep the labels but I don't paste them into my album. That is a little cheesy if you ask me. As far as the labels, I keep them. If I ever...
Nice obverse luster!
Well, I will admit that I have a few coins listed that I don't really want to sell. I consider them advertising pieces.
LOL, you miss it too, huh Lee?
I agree. Why do buyers think they are entitled to that information? The seller lists a BIN price and is entertaining offers. It is incumbent...
What do you call the BIN price? I call that speaking first.
Richie, As a seller, I do think this is out of line. The seller lists a BIN price and then gives the option of best offer. I don't mind you...
I would show up once a week with a single Beanie Baby in my hand and specifically request the guy who opened your box to assist you in accessing...
Separate names with a comma.
