Not the kind of doubling you want to see on a coin. Also has wear and corrosion.
What? It’s not a ring for a square finger? :smuggrin:
Thank you. I knew that label was wrong.
It much like yours, just no hole. Here’s a photo. Mines dated 1855. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Yes, but remember that acetone evaporates so put a lid on it.
Oh I like jars, especially antique jars. I just do not like tip jars. :)
I think AG-3 is correct.
I have a complete die clash on that denomination, just not sure of the year. Very common on this series.
A jar is useless to me. I only tip the person that serves or waits on me.
I answered in your other thread about these notes.
I don’t collect them but I do find them interesting. :)
Best and cool but not rare.
Just another government screwup.
With all of the comments on CT why are you still ordering from the mint?
It’s not Canadian.
It was minted by a worn die which caused that type of doubling. It’s called MD or mechanical doubling. A nice worn example but a spender.
You’ve been a member long enough but you have a lack of posts for the time you’ve been a member. It is customary to add a smily face, lol or state...
It’s mine. I just don’t have a photo of the obverse.
Calm but hot from this weather. :) Lol
Even the word radar is a RADAR. :)
Separate names with a comma.
