Fine details, corroded, net VG. Worth about $20. Regardless, to think you have in your hand a coin that's almost 200 years old for only $20...
Where's the roll? ;)
And here I thought that slabs were the only thing countefeitted... http://www.powerpro.com/press/news/details.asp?PP_PRESS_NEWS_ID=23 It...
I'm glad to hear you say that. It is a bitter pill to swallow sometimes, and I just wanted to be sure that you didn't get the wrong idea. :)
#1 looks like a 64. #2 looks like a 63. Nice coins, both of them.
I'd grade it 65 or 66 RD. Nice coin regardless of grade. Crazy to think this coin, now 49 years old survived like that!
That looks to me like a corroded buffalo. Unfortunately, most collectors will not value it as much as a non-corroded coin. Doesn't make it any...
AU 58 Our first commemorative half, I believe.
Dipped long ago and since retoned, I'd grade the coin somewhere around AU 50 to 55, depending on the amount of luster left. My only concern is...
People have been cleaning coins as long as they have been collecting them, and probably even before. After looking at this coin and the two...
p.p.s. you might try a soak in pure acetone.
p.s. honestly, it looks like it has already been cleaned.
no
I'm not sure about this particular series, but all my Danscos (7 total) have room for extra pages. I might suggest that you consider just buying...
Being a large cent collector, I am quite biased, but I agree 100% with Mark's suggestion. In fact, this was my first 1700's coin: [img][img]...
I'd grade the coin MS 63 BN, and darn attractive. Wouldn't be surprised if it was in 64 plastic because of the nice look. Much more attractive...
Odd, my first guess would have been a planchet void. Seeing it was graded as a strikethrough by ANACS, I'm at a loss to tell what it was struck...
Fooled again! Sneaky Larry, sneaky. :)
Here? :D [img]
Clearly tooled in upper hair.
Separate names with a comma.
