Second comment: It looks like a S-241.
First comment: That is not a S-234.
Frank, I have quite a different take.... FYI, red is a common color for corrosion on copper, and is nothing at all to be worried when...
Ms 67
p.s. that said, the only one that comes to my mind (other than some modern commems) is 3CNs from 1883 to 1889.
That is simply not true, at least judging by numbers of coins certified by TPGs and looking at the series as a whole. Check the pop reports if...
Looks real...really cleaned. That said, GDJMSP is right, you have to live up to your end of the bargain.
It is an educated guess, having looked at lots of photos and lots of coins in-hand. That said (and not to rag on him too hard) tdec's photos...
You're probably right... :desk: In case you're wondering, when I say AU 63, that means I think the coin is an AU coin that a TPG would grade...
p.s. I don't consider myself "sophisticated". ;)
ALthough I have a great deal of difficulty judging the coin from the photos provided, OGH 64 is my guess.
I realize that, and am aware of the differing amount of detail on the different reverse hubs, which speaks to the amount of detail in the...
AU 63 is my grade. ;) Wouldn't surprise me to be in AU 58 or MS 63 plastic.
p.s. the 95 looks like a weakly struck VF coin to me, but I can understand how others would grade/value it lower.
markfeldcoins.com coinraritiesonline.com
In my opinion the FS label, as currently defined, is silly. Why anyone would focus on a single spot on the coin when assessing strike is beyond...
Form the pics it looks to be a very nice coin. One question -- why would such an expensive coin not be certified? Second question -- is...
Very nice Mark. Love that '95.
Please define "problem".
I don't either, but can't say for sure. I've seen some VERY deceptive whizzing on nickel before. Methinks the hard metal makes it more difficult...
Separate names with a comma.
