Great find! Clamshell errors are on the difficult side to find. Congratulations
Not even close.
Definitely a nicer common date.
A couple of them may be nice enough that grading would be beneficial but breaking up that nice of a set would be difficult to do. I’d think about...
Very nice set of Caesar’s.
That 1952-D is a great lamination. It looks as if you could insert a small piece of paper under the error and it looks like a small piece broke...
Looks good to me as well. I think the wear patterns are correct for a genuine coin. The CC mint mark also looks like a VAM and a counterfeiter...
It’s a proof coin so leave as in. It’s a very minor error and the packaging is necessary to show it’s an error.
I’ll stick with the current scale. I’m too old to change. :)
I don’t collect commemorative coins but my 7070 album needed a few. Here’s what I have in the Dansco. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]...
Deal breaker friend in many things. The coin and the price, the grade since it’s in a slab, where and how big is the spot in question. You can...
I wouldn’t want mine to be replaced if I won it in the Olympics. The toning looks nice.
Definitely a magicians quarter worth a few dollars.
The 1943 is a lamination error and that’s very common in the silver war nickels.
A decent 1921, the last year of issue. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
A 1902-O, common but raw and nice. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
One of the more common CC’s but still highly desirable. It’s as n 1892-CC. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
One of more recent additions, an 1893. Only 378,000 and less surviving. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
