FWIW, here's a real coin to compare it to: [img][img]
I'm sorry to say that I agree with Mark and GDJMSP. :(
After further review, I would like to change my answer. :D I'm in the AU camp now. Still an attractive example regardless of grade.
Sill very cool! Thanks for sharing...Mike
You tease! Give us the grade already! ;) ..>Mike p.s. by chance, was it the reed mark on the cheek that held it back? p.p.s. If I'm...
p.s. the PCGS grading guide is another book you might consider. [edited to add: I see that was #3 on your list. :goofer: ]
After you buy and read those books, the next step in your education (in my opinion) should be to spend a day or three at any large auctoin looking...
Neat coins!
I was only joking. Still like 63 as a grade.
check out vtcoins.com Tim's a good guy.
May I change my answer? ;)
p.s. given the info provided, I'd guess 63 or 64, as I think the jawline hit is a biggie. Otherwise it looks like a 65+ coin.
What's going on with Washington's jawline?
p.s. I like the coin! :)
Luster looks good enough to go 58, and frankly, I've seen much less attractive examples in 62/63 plastic.
You might want to buy a book or two on VAMs -- there are several on the topic, but I'm not enough of a specialist to recommend the "best" one, but...
Separate names with a comma.
