Rickie! Sad to see them go I bet? But I completely understand and you have only best wishes from myself and my gang here. Let me know if you...
I guess we will have to just wait and see this coin in all the numismags.. ;)
Hey gang! I'm in need of a little help here. I think I have this coin identified. I'm thinking it's a 1796 S87... Thoughts? [IMG] [IMG]
Hey, Trying to find out some information. I have a customer who is looking for the value of a $5 series 472 in average condition. Can you help?
oh..... you guys don't already do that??? haha!
As far as I know this is the only one that the grading companies recognize.
That's a darn shame.
I do use a camera stand. I changed the settings on the camera and this was the result of the picture. Thoughts? [ATTACH]
Here is a pic of a good one. [ATTACH]
It's not.
It looks like my iso is set at 250 and my apeture is set at 26
I've tried playing with most all of the settings... I mean I can take what I think are good pictures... but I don't think they are exceptional....
That's the same setup I use with 3 daylight bulbs... 40D...105 MM sigma. sometimes I think the pictures could be more crisp...
I have a Sigma... and from time to time it leaves a little to be desired.
Did anyone read the couple paragraphs about CoinTalk in this months Numismatist? Good to see CT getting some press!
Growing pains!!
I will echo others with my experiences. I have to agree that if genuine this coin will bring less then a no problem example aside from the very...
It is unequivocally positively a cast counterfeit. The genuine pieces look completely different.
If the set wasn't UNC then spot silver is about the right price minus a coin or 2. Actually at the larger shows Littleton has been known to be...
In the future if you ever need to know silver melt take spot X .71
Separate names with a comma.
