That’s a cool idea and you have a good start! I’m looking forward to seeing what else you find.
Nice group overall and I like the one you are stoked about!
I did look there but it was inconclusive from my viewpoint. The 1950 & 1951 (and to some degree 1952 & 1953) proofs aren't what we are used to...
Something about it made me initially think proof but the bell lines made me reconsider (enough for FBL but not as sharp as you see on proofs)...MS...
I think it is fine to test them. An issue is that one or two coins won't show much. What I'd think would be more informative is if a larger...
MS 63....luster looks solid, strike is good, fields are baggy on both sides.
The full slab photo makes the MS 66 again look like the first photo-where 66 seems fair. The MS 63 full slab photo look nicer than your second set...
Nice; I've always liked these!
That's the same conclusion I reached. Some of the detail is too worn from what I can see on your pictures but my best guess is the 1853-today...
@Lehigh96 that makes more sense now. Those are some nice Denver Mint toners!
Most of the time the best you can do is find a range (not the exact date-especially for the more modern ones). Take a look here:...
Original photos: 65...semi-pl but not quite enough for PL 66...cleaner than the first Updated photos: 63...cheek looks a lot more baggy...
A sample slab is an example of a slab that the grading companies would hand out to advertise their product. Most of these tend to feature...
It was in original packaging (slabbed in one of those Anacs/OSV cases which includes the entire original set-only one board was shown; these are...
Was it worth it to crack out of the Anacs mint set slab? I would think most of those coins would sell for less once outside of the original mint...
MS 64 ....a few hits on the cheek prevent a gem grade on an otherwise solid looking Buffalo
I gave it the benefit of doubt with a 66 but said not FS (gash under third column). I see that DGS was fairly conservative. Congrats on finally...
It depends on what you have. Sometimes getting the same grade more than covers the submission fees.
Got you twice :p
And the reveal....AU detail cleaned [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
