haha!! Yeah that's definitely post mint damage.
Ok, I present my case as to why this is PMD. When I am done I want you to explain to us with all of your 40 years of error coin knowledge how...
When I get to work tomorrow I will show why this coin could only be PMD... complete with pictures... I don't have the energy tonight... Hopefully...
Really?? Are you some sort of detective? Or maybe its the name and websites in my signature that were your biggest clue. I have only mentioned you...
That's because it is PMD. Why? You are wrong. It is definitely not. Like I thought you have an excuse to not take me up on my offer.... stop...
So you are claiming that this coin struck through a late stage die cap and is also straight clipped? Do you know the odds of those 2 separate...
That guy looks like Denis Hopper's crazy(er) brother.
Spend em... even if they are worth more then a cent it'll be many years before you can melt them.... do you want to store bunches of copper cents...
Any marks left on the planchet would have been virtually wiped off when the coin was struck in the coining chamber... Also if the planchet went...
I respectfully disagree. I have literally seen hundreds of coins from this date with heavy die polish.
Not enough lines in the skirt to warrant anything other then a G.
Good 6 details lightly cleaned.
I don't think so. I see that it might grade as a DMPL but the amount and location of the bagmarks keeps it at a 63 or less.
Looks like die polish lines to me Doug.
It looks like that after the juice this coin broke $3,100. I have to admit that I am blown away by that. I was hoping it would break $1,500. [ATTACH]
The color as well.... it's really pink... that's not good either.
Separate names with a comma.
