Ahahahahahahaha! :D
I'm not missing this one!
63, I'd be surprized if they gave it a 64 considering the obverse and apparent lack of luster.
How am I missing these! Now I'm mad, I missed BOTH!
WTF? This was a gimme, how did I miss it? jez VERY nice coin!
You 1953 is just die deterioration, not the desired hub doubling.
Very nice set you have! I LIKE!
Not a hub doubled cent.
An addition to my collection, this makes #3.
NO! lol In fact, you should guess 70 on the next two so I feel more comfortable. :D
The verdigris is pretty fresh and looks light to moderate from what I can see. VC would be your best choice and it should work well. I would use a...
I also picked up this coin in the 72DDO trade, lusterous 70S small date:
I traded a bunch of silver coins for it to a member on another coin forum.
Just image, you know how hardcore I am about Lincolns....I've never owned one until now. I've been waiting years for the right coin and the right...
My newest acquisition! :D
WOW! That's a KILLER 30D!!!!!!
Insane luster!
Dang, it looks like it has slightly muted luster, guess I was wrong....classic "off by one".
465, I'll take it!
My newest acquisition!
Separate names with a comma.
