I don't think this is damage. If it's an error it could be "better" than a clipped planchet anyway.
All planchets aren't rolled exactly the same. Slightly thicker, slightly heavier. Even if you scale is 100% accurate, the difference is 7...
I'm going to gamble it's not MS 60 (which is not a common grade).
Proof (the steps are not likely on an MS 1955) 67
There isn't one member here who wouldn't be overjoyed at being included in seeing the first photos of a discovery coin, or an ultra rare newly...
The OP coin is damaged and it's a cull. The coins in post #3 (The portrait on the 46 looks wonky, but could be the bad angle) all looked harshly...
I think one problem is (besides scarcity) people always want to believe their 1982-D small date copper is real, or 1944 steel or 1943 copper etc....
You really did not read the article that says there basically aren't any. There is 1 known and 11 matte proofs. 1922 was a common year there are...
The Treasury Dept isn't spending any time, money or resources looking for this. If someone owned it, it could have been sold secretly to a...
If this is a proof, it is impaired.
He probably should have made the date 1963-D or 1965-D. Because now, anytime someone pops up with the "Rare 1964-D" it's going to be one of his...
Separate names with a comma.
