These coins are counterfeits. I have handled enough of them to tell from these pictures.
Did MMNS note it as a doubled die?
I wouldn't think it adds too much.
It appears to be a Chinese counterfeit. It's all wrong.
Those marks are a die clash of e plurbius unum. In the second picture you can see UM.
This is an Ebay listing by CoinTalk Member LostDutchman [IMG] $400.02 (28 Bids) End Date: Sunday Sep-04-2011 11:30:55 PDT Bid now | Add to...
This is an Ebay listing by CoinTalk Member LostDutchman [IMG] $1,276.11 (22 Bids) End Date: Saturday Sep-03-2011 14:53:49 PDT Buy It Now for...
This is an Ebay listing by CoinTalk Member LostDutchman [IMG] $75.00 (0 Bids) End Date: Saturday Sep-03-2011 11:47:39 PDT Bid now | Add to...
Here is a coin I just got done photographing and I wanted to share it. I thought it had a nice look to it as well as an interesting design....
HA!! Confusing thread of the day award winner here!
More confusion. Numismaster shows 1326 translating to 1947.
well that explains it! Thanks guys!
This is what I use to date them in Arabic. I had gotten 1324 as my best guess. But looking at it it could definitely be a stylized 6. [ATTACH]
I came across this piece recently. This is neat because the coin is in high relief. It's 90% gold and the same content as a sovereign. I wanted...
There are also plenty of PL and DMPL coins that look much worse after a dip. Some toning is deceiving and hard as heck to see through. You might...
I really haven't found any good explanation of how it happened... was the die just warped before hubbing?
At very first I thought that... But the more I looked at the more I liked it...
I have to say it sounds much easier then it really is. There are hundreds of dealers at a major show that would offer onside grading. These...
Maybe it's from removed tape?
We do??? That's news to me. I don't know a single dealer that uses the blue book... and I know a LOT of dealers. That's almost exactly what I...
Separate names with a comma.
