It would grade, but get that idea out of your head right now. Your coin simply doesn't have the value to be considered a worthwhile submission....
[IMG]
I think the strike and luster are too weak for MS66; my guess is MS65. I do love the color.
Ya know, there is a mark on the neck on the slab shot that doesn't really show up on your closeup photos. That might be the reason for the MS63...
Agree 100%. The spot bothers me more than the fingerprint, it is just in such a bad place.
Bought a small collection of raw Jefferson recently and am going to keep this 1965 SMS for myself. [IMG]
Ok which slab photo is better? Left or Right? Please vote in the attached poll, thanks! [IMG] As always, comments welcome.
Bravo Tom, this thread is TOTW, for all you Cointalkers who have been around for a while.
That is ridiculous! They punched the wrong date on that coin. It is supposed to be a 58-D!
A blue wing and a lavender wing, dripping with luster. Way too cool!
OMG WOW! Holy Cow! I think the 1940 is the cream of the crop! That said, they are all fantastic.
I agree, MS65
That is correct sir.
I'm not worried about the coins, they are circulated stuff with no real numismatic value. This holder is different than most Capital Plastic...
9.5 x 11.5
I remembered buying a collection a few years back that was in a holder. At the time, I was only interested in the coins. Good thing I didn't...
I decided that I needed to increase my knowledge of circulated Jefferson Nickels so I started a circulated Jefferson collection. But I didn't...
OK, they don't look like luster grazes anymore, I'm back at MS63.
Looks very frosty. My first impression was MS63, but after seeing the reverse in the flip I started to think that most of what is on Liberty's...
Separate names with a comma.
