I'm good with any decision. I enjoy both threads, but I would agree with @Johndoe2000$ that this thread is in ICU, and may not make it much longer.
Wow, that's pretty! $575
Gee thanks for those kind words @baseball21 ;) I'm not saying all buyers of PCGS, and certainly not those that take collecting seriously, like...
I prefer NGC. I collect early silver commems, and NGC is much tighter on them then PCGS from what I have seen. I have passed on numerous PCGS 63's...
I would say that is up to Larry, but IMO, if nobody has posted in 24 hrs, then it would be ok.
775
So I looked closer at the OP's coin. The lines on the cheek actually look like they could be from a flaw in the planchet, and not hairlines at...
For 2018, the biggest personal goal is to fix the relationship I have with my step-daughter (2017 was a very difficult year). Numismatically,...
Reflections of the lights bouncing on the internal lens elements, fyi.
Nice! My personal belief is you can never go wrong with a Colonial. I think it's a treat to have something so historical in a collection, and to...
I'm doing the 50 set, which in my case, is actually 52. I include the Norse and the Washington quarter. I'm 87% complete (45 out of 52). (I post...
In my opinion (not that it really matters), the lower value commems to me are just sort of 'gotta have them for the set' coins, and because there...
Thank you.
I think that was only for @heavycam.monstervam as a consolation prize for having the win taken away from him on the previous coin. ;)
I'm not a nickel guy, but I would also look at that coin and say it was cleaned. I'm under the impression that there wouldn't be die polishing...
Dang! You got chocolate, too!
$75
edit out the GC number - keep us honest!
But it worked.. I 'Liked' it!
Looks like we need a ruling on the Indian. @ddddd - what say you?
Separate names with a comma.
