It's Proof, but it would be details cleaned. At least that is my opinion. I could be wrong, but it sure looks like haloing around the devices.
It could have been this..... [MEDIA]
I did some homework on SEGS before I set my snipe bid on this Buffalo. I had read that they are pretty good on grading some of the classic...
I meant to get some sent in on that deal, but I procrastinated too long and for some reason was thinking it was good until the end of August.
Woohoo!! I don't win these very often. :smuggrin:
I personally think it has too many hits and not quite enough luster to get to 66. I'd be very happy with it getting 65.
64+FB. I would like to see it in a 65 but I think the small nicks on it hold it back. The luster is really nice.
66+ shot at 67. What a gorgeous dime!! The luster is just dripping.
I can see it a 65 all day long.
This was a good exercise in confirming whether or not I made a good purchase. I paid AU money for this Buffalo. It's currently housed in a SEGS...
The spikes to the left of UNUM are classic clashing left by the notch on the Indian's neck and jaw. They are very common. I did not notice the...
I hate to burst your bubble. But your coin is not the 1917 DDO that you think it is. First of all the doubling your coin exhibits is known as...
Here's another GTG for you @Cascade. It's a 1913 Type 1 Buffalo Nickel. I have not posted this one yet, it's a newp off of eBay. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I'm at a VF-20.
I'm in at a 66 as well.. It's funny that you posted this particular date and mm. I bought this exact date and mm about two weeks ago, and found...
Really sweet pickups!! I hope to bring some decent money to a large show one day. That '82-S is outstanding!! A really high end Morgan is on my...
Nice lab you have going @TJ1952. As a metal detectorist, the CLR works pretty well for the crusty Wheaties and older Nickels such as Buffalo's...
Oh I am. I wanted to make sure I got alerts on this thread. :D
I don't know. But I would like to know.
I'm over there as well.. I remember recently that someone sent is a 1918-7-S SLQ that did not get attributed, which should have been an automatic...
Separate names with a comma.
