Hi and welcome to CT. I answered this in your other/duplicate thread, but... What exactly are you asking? Yes, it looks like a real 1958-D...
I would not re-submit. It will always be an XF details coin, and I prefer the sound of "Corrosion Removed" over "Improperly Cleaned" or "Altered...
Numismedia puts a PR60 at $620. I agree with @C-B-D 's guess of $300, but it wouldn't surprise me to get close to $500 from this on ebay due to...
Hi and welcome to CT. What exactly are you asking? Yes, it looks like a real 1958-D Lincoln cent. It does NOT look like the 1958-D DD (Doubled...
This is the other set of pics I took: [ATTACH]
68
I'm going to add that I have been staring at this coin incessantly. I do see a break in the luster on the Pilgrim's cheekbone, but nowhere else on...
The die cracks are what make the coin. It's the FS-901 variety, and why I bought it.
I hear ya.... The photos below are from the auction house, they are not as sharp, and was what I had to go on. I also have a set of pics with...
92.50
Title says it all, really... [ATTACH]
525
And the Ed Wood GTG Award goes to.... (Drumroll please) [ATTACH] :p:p:p
I'd say leave neutral feedback, and leave it at that. Something like - "Seller cancelled after item sold too low" Short and sweet, and not too...
That guide in the Numismatist is like PCGS's guide on steroids - way over valued. It's a 'retail buyer's guide', and while, yes, we (us...
I'd say either acid or improperly dipped. I wouldn't buy it with my ex-wife's money.
I personally feel that all modern coinage (post-64) will never be worth more then face. Exceptions being errors and varieties.
70
I'm in agreement with @Mainebill on this. It's a lovely coin, and the eye appeal from the toning is nice, but there is enough distractions in key...
Isn't that the second time you've done that to me? :mad:
Separate names with a comma.
