66
A beauty 67 .
63 no large hits but no luster . Genuine wouldn't suprise me though .
How did I miss this thread , lucky for me though , because this was a 67 to me .
I voted for Zach , why ? He bribed me . :)
But like Dick said they weren't there when graded . Or were just starting . :)
Now the question becomes , if the mint did it intentionally is it really AT ?
Love the color , 65 .
So close to a NGC 67 so a 67 it is .
Luster won't push it to 67 with that spot , 66 .
Gave the 66 a 67 and the 67 a 66 , lol .
Ngc= 66
67 , it's the luster .
Too perfect is right , these were crudely struck by a hammer . The holder looks older than the coin . :)
Matt I guess some people just don't want to hear the answer you give them . The idea about blocking overseas sales does sound doable in the future...
Overguessed by one on this one , underguessed by one on the other . Ugh!!!!! :)
Still I can only go by the photos given , and that's what it looked like to me . Guess that's the dangers of grading by pictures .
Better than I did , keep it up and you'll be in the top ten in no time .
I wanted to go conservative , LOL , undergraded both by one .
Separate names with a comma.
