One beautiful coin !!!!! And my wifes birth year . I think PCGS would go 67 on this beauty too .
Great luster , but too many marks on face shoulder and reverse to make 67 , 66 .
I'm thing 63-64 , going with 64 .
67 for Luster and NGC .
She's a beauty , I'll go with 64 too , if the obverse had a tad more luster showing it could go 65 , the fields are sure clean enough for it even...
Thanks Dick , I was wondering how I could still be in 1st . Lucky for me I was so wrong . LOL
If you're not going to sell it , then crack that baby out . Those hits don't look bad to me , they should have graded it .
Dick how many weeks before you throw this puppy out ? missed by 4 . My grade should go up that week . :)
I know I went high with 55 , but I swear that's a 50 coin at least . Well at least I got the other one . lol
All covered except 58 , any takers ? :)
I looked at Heritage , but compared it to a '14-D which may have got a small bump for rarity . Should of checked the same date .
Au-55 .
Well we know it isn't MS . :)
67 for luster .
Thad is really kicking some behind . Way to go buddy . :)
I'm inclined to agree with you , especially with PCGS . Then with those reverse flaws it could be a detailed coin , but I doubt it .
I'll go 67
66 , those planchet flaws on the reverse are what worries me .
I should have said NCS , NGCs conservation arm .
Still a beautiful proof , I'd send it to NGC for conservation .
Separate names with a comma.
