Yours Ruben , congrats but now I'm jealous . : )
Definately one of your better works , they're all good , in my opinion . Love it .
You're probably right , but why do you say that ? I can barely see the MM from that pic .
Luster of a 67 , but those spots ?
Beautiful coin , 67 .
Congrats buddy , I remember when I 1st made it , a good feeling .
Probably a 66 .
Missed em both by one , one high , one low . lol
I figured it was dipped , it still has cartwheel on the obverse . What makes you say harsh cleaning ?
Here's a 1832 1/2 Dime graded as MS-60 here the obverse looks MS but the reverse looks like it has wear . Granted it's in an ANACS slab ....
Love em gobroke , great pics too .
The problem with those two definitions and roll friction in general is they're now slabbing album friction , andbank counting friction as all...
Maybe this will help . [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
Then I would do what Mike just recommended , look on Heratige at a authentic MM . Here's a link to compare ....
I'm just going by how the MM looks laying on the field , it doesn't look like it's part of the coin . If you look at it with a 10X or stronger...
Fields and luster look like a 65 to me . About the luster break that dimeguy mentioned is it really degraded or is it in the pics , since you have...
I've heard some good things , and some not so good things . But the bad things are usually said by people that wouldn't touch a coin even with...
Like Thad said , either a 66 or 67 , has the luster for a 67 but that week strike . But NGC loves that luster . Have to go with the luster , 67 .
Were the spots there when slabbed , is the question ? Going 65 .
Good thread Ruben , finally a modern coin I like from my ancestors homeland that I'd like to get .
Separate names with a comma.
