Looks like just another method of separating you from your REAL cash.
No fear, it's fairly volatile and it will certainly be completely vaporized when the grill is heated. What you don't want is to get in on your...
It's good you came here to defend yourself. As an ebay seller myself, I understand your frustration. Did she leave negative feedback before...
You can see the label: "Contains 2-butoxyethanol and sodium hydroxide". It is NOT an acid, it is a strong base probably with a pH greater than...
The coin actually looks a LOT better in your pictures. I'd call it AU50, it still has some nice red. Does it cartwheel? Personally, assuming is...
The damage is done, the coin will never be the same.
You're lucky you got the coins. About 3-4 years ago I mailed a very well-packaged group of Lincolns. After a few days the buyer said they never...
Oh man, that's a REAL heartbreaker! Looks like someone slipped taking it out of a 2x2. ALWAYS pry staples AWAY from the coin. LOL
Like any other gem level coin, it comes down to luster and eye appeal moving from 65-66-67. That's hard to pick up from a picture.
Keep in mind that many gold coins are alloyed with copper and other metals. I realize some Mint products are 0.9999, but those trace metals are...
Poorly conducted experiment based on the given information. There's no way acetone is going to photocatalyze to acetic acid under "ambient...
You got a great deal on that! I've been looking for one for a long time.
1968 was the last year for the obverse master hub. At that point, the hub was so worn that the dies produced from it had a dished appearance and...
Nice cracked skull!
I've had this happen a couple times, both times acetone kind of hazed the surface. I ran the coins though water and xylene after the acetone, then...
A 1915 in VF is worth about $15. This is one of those types of coins definitely worth saving but not worth enough to send to NCS.
63/64 details
63/64 RB, the pictures make the any luster look flat. $25-30 coin
Nope, just a regular business strike.
Personally, I wouldn't call a molecular layer a "film", since it completely undetectable by eye or even instrumentation (i.e. PCGS sniffer).
Separate names with a comma.
