+1
@Johndoe2000$ , where can a fella purchase one of those? That's pretty neat.
Stands to reason that one who feels the coin is a 63/64 never would have paid a 66 price to begin with and would not be out anything when selling.
Are you implying that the current "standards" being used by the TPG's are more precise and less open to interpretation than in the past?
AU details - cleaned
I don't know, the more I look at it...……..it's kinda growing on me. The reverse is awesome and the obverse side profile is reminding me of a...
That's the first thing I thought as well! Congrats on the anniversary @paddyman98 and here's to many more!!
I still have log in credentials on the NGC board, but the CT is the only one that I call home.
Tell ya what, @CoinBlazer , PM me your mailing info and I'll send you the problem 1830 CBH pictured below. This one has that circam look and it...
That is why I gave it the 5FS as well.
Entry post 3, 12, 10, 8, 7, 9, 1, 2, 4, 5, 11, 6 Have always loved the SLQ, here's my example (pic is from the Teletrade auction I won it from):...
I voted MS66 5FS, nice looking coin.
Looks like a nice one. I personally wouldn't bid any higher than what it's currently at ($146).
Count me in as well. Would be awestruck looking at all the goodies. Like you, Randy, I also would like to add a post colonial issue to my...
I vote 63 on this one.
I agree with Paul on this. I don't understand the negative reactions either. I'll be in line for at least one as well.
@Skyman , thank you so much for taking the time to write these up. Each submission was very interesting and I learned a lot about this historic...
I voted 67, love the looks of that one, especially the reverse.
I suspect that the coin in question is AT, but I like it! I'm sure that there's someone out there that would be willing to pay a premium for such...
Truly works of art right in the palm of your hand! Nice coins, Shrews!
Separate names with a comma.
