Since I don't have a 63-D, I guess I will share two 63-Ps. 1963-P: [IMG] [IMG] 1963-D: :banghead:
Then explain how they do it without being exposed? I’m serious, if they inform their grading staff in any written form, a copy of one of those...
No it isn’t BS, I’ve explained it 1,000x on this forum.
I think it doesn't matter!
You should have done a guess the grade on that one, woulda been fun.
1962-P: How did this not get a star? [IMG] 1962-D: Better detail than the Philly but still tough to find with any steps. [IMG]
ANACS PR64 The coin has nice color, but those photos don't really show the surfaces and it is impossible to see the flaws or the depth of the...
PF 65 CAMEO
Are you talking about TCCS?
Well, it’s called Sleepy Hollow for a reason.
Yep, I don’t have one
What the hell are you talking about? How did my standards change? All I did was give my opinion about a coin on a coin forum from a series I...
Um, not nobody, we got a guy right here!
Ok, so the first TPG net graded the coin and the second TPG bags it, but our resident coin grading savant thinks they are both wrong, for one...
Agreed, and my advice was targeted to avoid big losses. Transaction fees are so high that actually making a profit as a collector is nearly...
Everyone in this thread seems hung up on profit, and while making a profit is nice, it seemed that your question was not really about profit, but...
The 1960's mark the return of just horrible quality produced by the mint. Finding coins without remnant planchet flaws and decent step detail is...
I am a little behind so here are my 59s 1959-P: [IMG] 1959-D: Another date/mm where I don't know which one to pick [IMG] [IMG]
When you try to change wear to damage, you absolutely are trying to change it. You are on an island now.
To all the guys in this thread who are claiming this coin is overgraded, you just don't understand market grading. I don't care if this coin has...
Separate names with a comma.