They also have a corresponding page online which gives values. I never found it particularly useful, but it's there.
[ATTACH] Only one i have photographed. I have a couple dozen that I can't find in any reference. [ATTACH]
@11:57 in the video reminds me of this reverse. [ATTACH]
Constantine or Constantius II from Antioch
[ATTACH] Constantius II 350 AD AE Centenionalis Mint: Siscia Obvs: DN CONSTANTIVS PF AVG. Diademed, draped, and cuirass bust right. * behind, H...
Yes I believe it is. The details are severely lacking.
Even with the corrosion and cleaning scratches, that is very nice for the type. [ATTACH] Antiochus I Soter Mint: Ai Khanoum 281 to 261 BC Obvs:...
This fake reminds me of this seller whom frequently offers coins with a very similar patina.
I really can't disagree. What David said is very accurate, a worn face = $10, a perfect face many multiples of that.
As far as I know the reverse is always the hammer die, or at least that's the way Vagi explained it to me, and would be held with thongs while the...
Always regretted not bidding on the 15 piece that went unsold in Triton VI.
I have not read that anywhere. Do you have a link?
You will find #4 on this page.
Hopefully this will help identify #4.
This provincial should be well after the reform, even though it's exact purpose is a bit of a mystery. [ATTACH] Alexandria mint Obvs: DEO...
I had a Trajan at one time, but I have this one from Phoenicia. [ATTACH] Arados Year 164, 96/95 BC Obvs: Female bust Astarte-Europa right, wearing...
You would have to look up RIC or another standard reference, but I have no doubt it is Leo. You could also ask @Brian Bucklan since those are his.
That looks like a Leo I to me.
My opinion is the 2nd coin is a cast copy of the first. Bad photography could explain some discrepancies, but the lack of details, mysteriously...
I have a similar with this common flaw. [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
