[ATTACH] Commemorative Series Mint Constantinople 330 AD Obvs: POP ROMANVS, Draped bust of genius left, cornucopia over shoulder. Revs: Bridge...
A third possibility would be under civic authority for Antioch. [ATTACH] Philip I 95 to 75 BC Mint: Antioch or Eastern mint AR Tetradrachm Obvs:...
After 1600 years on the ocean floor [ATTACH] Source...
[ATTACH]
Roman's did use trial strikes, but they look nothing like the coin you pictured.
I think what the op is talking about is a trial strike. It's possible it could be made of lead or commonly an oversized flan of bronze. I would...
Entry is for a hoard Qazvin IGCH 1796 Your coin is referenced from a collection in Maryland. Looks like I have a typo. Should be horizontal left.
Qazvin Hoard is 10b. There is no image but I have an example image of 10c on this page.
The flan crack is common for these and the surfaces appear very rough.
The coin you pictured is Antiochus VI not Seleucus VI. I don't see any issues with authenticity, just condition.
The 18th was destroyed in 9AD, but it was the one formed by Octavian and not Marc Antony. Octavian copied many of the legion numbers already in use.
I would say there are the same. SC attributes these to Antiochus I but yours appears to be the same. Here is another [ATTACH]
I would just write a parser but I'm sure it'll be fixed soon. You're right, that is easier.
Separate names with a comma.
