These are tough for me to grade. I'd guess ANACS MS-64FH
I don't see any D over inverted D's listed. There are several D/D's listed at the above link though. Do any of them look like the example you found?
I'm in the Fine details harshly cleaned camp.
Strike: 65 Luster: 66 Eye Appeal: 64 The light toning adds some appeal but the carbon spots and chatter on the obverse and reverse detract from...
Strike: 65 Luster: 66 Eye Appeal: 66 Contact marks: 62 Obverse 64 Reverse Net 63 Overall: 65 I really like the color on this one.
$59.00 would certainly make that a much easier decision to make at cracking. It looks like it certainly helped quite a bit. Nice job.
Yeah I kinda blew this one. I still don't agree with the 65 grade it's been given, but that's my opinion, I'm guessing there is more going on...
No I didn't find the casino tokens. The only time I've seen something like those was in Vegas years ago.
Well they would be used as chips and you can buy in for whatever denomination you wanted. Just imagine a pile of 30 Morgan's laying in a pot. :)
Wow!! :D
Don't get him started, there will be fewer for us... LOL
I must be seeing things you guys don't, or maybe it's the other way around. I see a really clean cheek and fields, with the biggest distraction...
Awesome!! You know what would be fun, is playing with a bag of cull Morgan's. I've alway's wanted to do that. The sound of them being tossed...
Strike: 66 Luster: 66 Eye Appeal: 67 Contact marks: 66 Obverse 67 Reverse Overall: 66+
You think this has a weak strike? It looks pretty hammered to me. The hair on the obverse is really good for an O mint Morgan.
1893 - AU55 1909 - MS64BN
Proof Details environmental damage of some sort. The surfaces are just dead.
FR-02
1827 CBH. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Some of them look like die scratches others look like they are PMD. It's hard to tell from the photo's. But as said above, if they are raised...
Separate names with a comma.
