So close on the "01119111". Almost a repeater!
Are we talking thousands or tens of thousands for value?
Merc-66 Morgan 1879 -63 Morgan 1881 -64
Would have been cooler if they were still in the handles, IMO.
Solder? It's definitely not a mint error, so more than likely a machine shop creation.
Great gift! Now you can go through it and say.... "Got it, got it, got it, need it, got it, need it.....":D
We're all waiting for you to finish round 8.....
As for the plastic being "archival" or not, so far so good. Forty years and the coins and note seem to be untouched.
Not an error or variety. As the others have said.... plate split doubling. This link will show you the difference between doubling that is...
This is the only reference I could find relating to coins: "“European Patina” is just a polite way to describe a coin whose patina has been...
Both are close but no cigar.
I'd keep the first and last two. The "0040004" could be considered a binary repeater. The first and last one are radars. Not a whole lot of...
Same with me.... the day I gave a lecture on how to identify counterfeit notes, was the day a driver took the $100! (we also have the UV light).
I've never come across a fake toonie. I have, however collected a couple of loonies that may be fakes. They have poor detail and are of a much...
Okie Dokie.:D
Just damaged. If it was a DDO, you couldn't tell now.
This is a section from the Charlton coin guide that shows the OP's coin. [IMG]
What is it that makes you think it's counterfeit? I'm missing something here.
I never made it that far. About four minutes for me. If he has something important to say..... he'll be the only one that knows about it.
:devil:
Separate names with a comma.
