I certainly could be wrong as well. The images are very difficult to read as the surfaces seem to really lack a lot of luster. But, from what I...
Typical weak strike, I don't think that is wear on the obverse. I think it's from contact with the material that caused the toning. It has a...
PCGS likes luster and this one is a massive luster bomb! The sun is clean and the fields are clean. The reverse is clean as well. I can see...
$395.00
I haven't posted in here for a while. I just picked up this 1882-O Morgan Dollar VAM-38a today. To me it has a lot going for it. It's a Kimpton...
I think it graded 67.
Thanks guy's, I really like this Mercury Dime. It's found a nice home in my collection. :)
Make sure the guy has not listed any of the coins he bought from you. If he has, he may be using the PO as a way to defer the return period. If...
And the winner again. LOL The price I paid was $23.09 on eBay. Gotta love those mid-week middle of the day auctions. :)
I'd agree with you on that. The bands would meet PCGS's definition for FB but not NGC's.
I'd say it's 100% a legit clipped planchet. All the tell tale signs are there to support it. A weak Blakesley Effect and the weakness in the...
Here's a 1940-S Mercury Dime. It's graded MS-65 in a small white ANACS Holder. It's still in my collection so you will have to guess what I paid...
Woohoo!! I'm up to 3 now, look out @ddddd I have you in my sights. If you quit now, I'll catch up by mid 2019. :smuggrin: Give me a moment to...
MS-66 all day long with a good shot at 66+.
I'm not surprised. It's pretty clean and I bet it has nice luster still.
I can see NGC giving this a 63 with a slight chance at 64 on a good day. As for PL, I'd have to see it in hand, usually it's easier to guess PL...
I see it as a 64. Gorgeous color!!
It looks pretty clean to my eye, I'd wager it's in a 65 holder.
$295.00
I'm at a 64 on this one as well. The marks in the fields are too big to support anything higher in my opinion.
Separate names with a comma.
